[ad_1]
The fight against piracy on the Internet seems to have no end. The owners of the broadcasting rights and the most important football leagues in Europe continue their crusade to eliminate any service offered IPTV lists illegal and free soccer.
In recent years, we have witnessed all types of strategies, from implementing fines for users that consume pirated content until the implementation of advanced tools such as the so-called Piracy Shield.
This system, designed to block sites and IP addresses that distribute illegal IPTV listshas been one of the most aggressive tools used by governments to combat this type of piracy, but in the end it has not been entirely effective.
However, despite the efforts and sanctions applied, the problem has not been eradicated, and These services continue to find ways to bypass blockseither through virtual private networks or by altering servers.
The new law that seeks to hit piracy harder
In this context, A new law in Italy could deal a blow to piracy. This is legislation that proposes to force providers of VPN and DNS to implement blocks on all websites that offer access to illegal IPTV lists.
This marks a significant advance in the fight against all illegal content, since until now, VPN services and some providers had been tools used by users to circumvent the blocks imposed by governments and telecommunications operators.
The idea behind this measure is clear: nip in the bud all avenues that allow access to pirated contentattacking not only the web pages that offer it, but also the intermediaries that facilitate access to these resources.
At first glance, this might seem like a breakthrough in the fight against illegal streaming. But, according to experts, there would be side effects because, although it may seem like a victory for the rights owners, This measure could have serious consequences.
Collateral damage: On the Internet, many websites share resources and servers. If a server is blocked for containing illegal contentaccess to legitimate content hosted at the same location would also be blocked.
Covert censorship: This law could be used to justify blocking websites that have nothing to do with piracy, but are considered “uncomfortable” by certain sectors.
Slowed innovation: Forcing VPN and DNS providers to implement blocking could deter investment in new technologies and services in the Internet sector, which would be catastrophic.
Privacy at risk: If VPN and DNS services are forced to log and monitor their users’ activity to comply with the law, what guarantees do we have that our privacy will be protected?
Furthermore, these actions could create a dangerous precedent that other countries could follow, spreading a censorship model on the Internet under the pretext of protecting the entertainment industry. Therefore, it is essential that these types of laws be debated with restraint.
Get to know how we work in ComputerToday.
Tags: IPTV
[ad_2]
Source link
