This teacher has returned to the traditional exam because his students use ChatGPT in their assignments. And this is a delay

The arrival of chatbots into our lives has brought with it many advantages when it comes to making searches more efficient or have complex information in seconds in front of us. But not everything is good, since these AIs such as ChatGPT also They have settled in the institutes and faculties of our country doing the work of the students (and even their exams). And this is obviously not something that a teacher liked.

And if you are a student, it has surely crossed your mind to enter ChatGPT and Through a sentence where you tell him the theme of the work you must do, you ask him to write it for you. At that moment you copy and paste it (without even checking what it says) and hand it to the teacher. This is what the professor of Contemporary History at the Complutense University, Gutmaro Gómez Bravo, says. to the world.

ChatGPT as the ‘doer’ of university assignments par excellence

This teacher tells in this interesting interview how he has detected that his students, and highlighting “even those in the first row”, They use ChatGPT to do the work. And this is something that he cannot tolerate in his subject, since his evaluation plan did not have to take any type of exam. Only four works from four different books were enough to pass, although those made by ChatGPT were not valid.

In this case, the professor has categorically stated that “Sending assignments is useless because students use ChatGPT”, returning to a traditional exam system with which he does not agree. And he thinks that ‘they should not have to memorize Trafalgar de Galdós as they memorize historical facts from the History of Spain.’

That is why ChatGPT is being a real challenge for any university or institute teacher, since they have to adapt their way of evaluating so that the student is the one working and not a machine. And this teacher reports that it is easy to detect a text that is not written by the student by following “the same story” and the use of “language that is supposedly scientific, but that in the end turns out to be artificial.” And it is true that from some more technical topics you can notice that the tone is not what you expected.

But the real problem comes when several students use the same program to complete the work. Here teachers clearly see how the approach is the same, they tell the same story or have the same sources. And it is something that must be detected by intuition, since anti-plagiarism tools like Turniting they do not have this ability to detect AI content. They are limited only to checking if the text is on the network and if the classic ‘copy and paste’ has been done.

This is why teachers are very angry with AI, and are choosing not to give it the option to be used in classes. As a university student I must say that in one year its use has been quite standardized, and that can be used in the academic field. But it’s one thing to make a more complex query and another to ask them to do an entire job that you simply copy and paste into a blank document to deliver. That is why limits must be imposed on its use in areas such as academia.

In Genbeta | Artificial intelligence consumes a lot of water: just ten ChatGPT queries can be enough to waste up to a liter